The Green Lion is an alchemical image of the green raw energy of nature, "the green fuse which drives the flower" as the poet Dylan Thomas once elegantly wrote. It is also a symbol of our our urge to perfection, that which moves us to grow, to push past pain, to struggle forward. Welcome to my very under-used blog with an emphasis on green ideas, politics, theology and perhaps other interests like crafting beer and fermented concoctions.

Wednesday, October 15, 2014

For immediate release
Oct. 11, 2014
Abbotsford, BC

Loewen confirms candidacy for Council

Nathan Loewen - Candidate Photo croppped.jpgNathan Loewen is pleased to confirm his registration with the City of Abbotsford for candidacy in the upcoming electoral race for Council.  Nathan is born and raised in Abbotsford and is running in this election out of a desire to see his community take on sustainability more seriously, to have it become a greener city with a healthy and economically-viable living environment for all.  

As a parent raising a young family with his wife, Nathan firmly believes in making public decisions with a long term view in mind at all times, so that future generations can one day inherit a community and world to be proud of.  This is only possibly, he contends, if we collectively make significant transitions that take into account our economy’s biophysical limitations and ecological footprint. It is especially pertinent for Abbotsford in regards to land use planning, urban sprawl and waste diversion, issues which are primarily in the control of municipal government. Nathan is also concerned about improving public transportation, smart planning for urban densification, increasing green spaces and ecological reserves, and prioritizing initiatives to resolve the crises of homelessness.  

Nathan has worked as a company director, manager and estimator in a local contracting business for the past five years.  He is a Geography graduate from UFV and UBC, and is currently studying Renewable Resources at BCIT.  He has volunteered in a number of community and conservation groups in the Lower Mainland and has the personal strengths and balance to cooperate with others to work towards effective solutions.  Nathan's political philosophy has been informed in part by his engagement in faith based social justice and political activism for homeless and low-income residents in Vancouver, and is currently on the Fraser Valley Regional Committee of the Green Party of BC. His interests include hiking, ecological restoration, history, theology and craft brewing.

Media Contact:
604-308-8149

Wednesday, September 24, 2014

[Originally written for a certificate course on Sustainability at Royal Roads University]

What is Sustainability? A shared alternative vision...

February 24, 2009 at 5:20pm
In response to the overly simplistic question, "What is the problem facing society, if any? How does Sustainable Development address this problem?", I wrote this position statement:

The current problem human society is facing - if I would dare to call it the singular problem - is evidenced in manifold ways throughout the world, far too many to name. We already know many of the effects of this inherently deep rooted problem: biophysical consequences such as the loss of biodiversity and animal habitats, enhanced climate change, soil erosion, desertification, environmental pollution, increased cancers and diseases, etc.; socioeconomic consequences such as the increasing gap in global poverty and affluence (or underconsumption and overconsumption), exploitative runaway capitalist systems causing the inequitable distribution of resources (both natural and human), marginalization and oppression of those being denied such resources, increasing mortality and birth rates among the global poor, etc.

So, if these manifold harmful effects emanate from a cause, or if these negative trends could be summarized by a fundamental problem we are facing as a society, I would suggest that we suffer from a dominant worldview, paradigm, and set of values that interpret the world around us and ourselves as being deeply isolated units in a vast system, wherein humans are separate from nature, from each other, and inevitably, from the amazing depths of ourselves as well. Much of our readings and each other's comments in this course so far have already mentioned this, and it is important to stress the issue. This paradigm is intrinsic to our contemporary, neo-classical economic model, which has been responsible for rapid industrialization, ecological destruction, massive social and political instability. Through 'economic development', this paradigm has developed a consumerist society that has dominated the individuals conception of ones purpose and/or place in the world, and that has reinforced the structural processes of exploitation (human and non-human) and environmental destruction for the sake of meeting our newly nurtured "needs".

We need to re-conceive ourselves. Assessing who we are in the scheme of things is one of the most important judgments we can make, because from that judgment everything else follows. Are we simply consumers of nature's wealth or are we members of nature's household? An ecological economic model needs to replace our current one, but that means shifting our values and worldview, starting with the local community we are in, and working outwards.

Sustainable Development, or better, the concept of sustainability, is an excellent resource to utilize in the struggle to re-conceive ourselves, collectively and individually. I am beginning to see sustainability less as a standard, or objective, for our society to achieve, and more of a voice, a vision, and a vehicle to take us away from the state of apathy, complacency and individualistic consumerism we are so easily seduced into. This is in accordance to how Robinson (2004) describes it essentially as a political act, not a scientific concept. Sustainability names the woes that afflict our world, revealing the destruction and death hiding behind our technological prowess and the elites' notion of continual progress and wealth-creation at any cost. Sustainability unmasks the dominant vision of unending progress under the 'business as usual' methods, as well as the vision of a distinct separation between humanity and nature. Practicing sustainability that knows and cares about our responsibility to, and impact on, others as an alternative to the dominant individualistic practice of consuming without care to our interconnectedness, can take us as communities and societies to a more abundant life for all. Of course, sustainability can be seen through anthropocentric and utilitarian lenses as well, which I think may 'prolong the human endeavour', as Chris Ashley states, but could also increase the net harm and destruction on earth in the long term if humans continue to act only in their apparent self-interest.

Sustainability has provided us with alternative voices and visions of our place in the world and our current state as a society. The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare, Genuine Progress Index (GPI) and Well-being Index are important aspects of re-conceiving ourselves, and what the 'good life' is, offering more holistic assessments of humanity's progress than the GDP.

The best summarization I know of the imperative of sustainability is this, by Robert Costanza:
"Probably the most challenging task facing humanity today is the creation of a shared vision of a sustainable and desirable society, one that can provide permanent prosperity within the biophysical constraints of the real world in a way that is fair and equitable to all of humanity, to other species, and to future generations." (Costanza et al. 1997, An Introduction to Ecological Economics, 179).

This means sustainability is a social vision, and in the broadest sense, a political vision: one that affirms how we would like to live, given how we can live. This is "a vision of the good life that sees our good as within the good of the planet, now and always." (McFague, 2001, Life Abundant, 108). Such a vision may not solve all the world's problems, but it performs a critical role in illuminating the end of things as they currently are playing out, voicing an alternative to the death-creating addictions we are immersed in, and when practiced on a local, down to earth scale, sustainability can can take us back to the deeply rooted judgment of ourselves and affirm our belonging to nature, and affirm our responsibility for our actions towards the rest of nature. And from there, everything else follows.

Thursday, April 28, 2011

Election Venting

  I have to confess, I'm a huge fan of politics.  And I'm also sick and tired of 'politricks', aka, narrow minded partisan slander, power hungry Machiavellian maneuvers, and contemptuous condescension from our public servants and ruling business elite. I do get excited during election campaigns, as well as during every political controversy that gently rocks our lethargic Canadian society awake every once in a while.  I have been tuning in to public policy debates and politics for about 10 years now, with my own views generally remaining open to possibilities and open to critique and consideration, while succumbing at times to the tribal, sports-like thrill of cheering on your own team as well.  I see the feelings I have in others as well, though it's usually directed at playoff hockey games or the Olympics.  At least I take solace in the fact that my favoured 'sport' actually has real world ramifications.  But then I realize how much a shame, and a sham, our political system is when it is viewed as such a horse race-spectator sport between competing parties and personalities, and promoted as such by so many in the (mostly TV) media.
   My political views have been shampooed, conditioned and shaped by various factors - including my social, economic and religious background, education, spiritual reflection and life experiences. They are not static and unchangeable. I have come from originally supporting the Canadian Alliance and then Conservatives, for social, moral and personality reasons, as well as in reaction to the seemingly corrupt and arrogant Liberals. Through my wrestling with the importance of having an environmental conscience for God's creation (our life-support system), which should underlie all economic growth and development,  I came to consider myself a "Green Tory" or liberal-Conservative in university, who wanted to put the "conserve" back into Conservative.  I soon started flirting with the Green Party as well (a radical heresy I once thought to myself). 
  But ever since the Conservatives became the Government in 2006, I experienced extreme disillusionment with both the Party and my supposed conservative values, while I began to feel... enlightened I guess you could say, in regards to many things in my own life and what I actually believed to be important in life and in society more generally. The Conservatives did not seem to be 'on about' anything I could now legitimately care passionately for as a Christian or environmentalist - some of them claimed to be opposed to abortion and other such 'liberal' social problems- but then why don't they care for life consistently, for people during the rest of their lives?
   I was propelled into the visionary, common-sense idealism of the Green movement, which refused to be pigeonholed as either Left or Right ideologically, which pragmatically offered solutions for all to consider. As a global movement, Greens think beyond the considerations of just our province or our country.  All Green Parties hold to 6 fundamental values:
  I have since come to also greatly appreciate the work and witness of the New Democratic Party in Canada as well, as they have 'spoken truth to power' and campaigned for social justice, fighting poverty and homelessness, and enacting serious environmental legislation.  Despite a few reservations, I have come so far as to support them in this current election - the reason for which is twofold: 
  1) Electoral dysfunction (lack of proportional and participatory democracy in Canada) has made it more and more difficult for Canadians to feel their votes actually make a difference, or that the results are unfair.  Since we currently have only once choice in voting, when there is a close race between only 2 candidates, it seems more logical to vote against one if you really do not want them to win, than to vote for another 3rd or 4th candidate who has no chance of winning. This is strategic voting, which I also was opposed to until this current election has made it necessary for me to reconsider, for good reason... this leads me directly to:
  2) This purpose for this election, unfortunately, is primarily a vote for or against the "Harper Government", as it has been officially rebranded by our humble and fearless leader.  Stephen Harper has lied so many times to the Canadian people, and to our Parliament, since becoming Prime Minister it is hard to keep track. His fear of the Canadian people is evident by how closely he tries to keep things secret from the public and from Parliament, despite breaking constitutional rules in doing so - Afghan detainee abuse secrets, military expense secrets, etc.- to the point of his party being legitimately found in "contempt of Parliament", for the first time in the history of the Commonwealth.  His flagrance towards, and disregard for, our system of parliamentary democracy is screaming out as he muzzles his own cabinet, and after trying to financially destroy the other parties, claims that it is recklessly unconstitutional and wrong for the majority of democratic representatives to cooperate together, and out of necessity, try to form an alternative government to his own.  This is thinly-veiled autocracy (and he doesn't even have a majority government yet!) 
  
  This Government has done its utmost to stall any progress on combating global climate change, thereby becoming climate criminals of the future generation. There is no issue more grave for our short-sighted politicians to act on than protecting our planet's capability to support this project we call human civilization (or at least "Western Civilization", right conservatives?).  We are literally in the midst of an age of species extinction, with 90% of the ocean's large fish now gone, and 50% of all animals and plant species disappearing this century. 
  "But all I want are tax cuts for big corporations, and to use up our limited natural resources as quick as we can... and to lock up more unruly youth in prisons!" says Harper's fantasy of the Canadian public.


  In my opinion, Stephen Harper's moralistic self-righteous political attitude reeks of hypocrisy- henceforth to be known as 'Harpercrisy'? - as he rules according to Machiavellian principles of deceit, cunning and subterfuge, happy to break his own laws whenever it pleases him (He passed a good law of fixed election dates in 2007 that he then broke in 2008 in order to take advantage of a weakened Liberal Party, in case we have forgotten). The Conservative Party attack ads and tactics are as cheap and false as they can possibly be, daily reinforcing my disdain for them every time I have to hear them.
I will repeat the lament of Rafe Mair, former BC Minister of Environment and radio talk show host,


"Is this what we're going to support?
A party in contempt of Parliament?
A party that directly participates in the decimation of our wild salmon, the soul and symbol of British Columbia?
A party quite willing to sacrifice our resources so that the U.S. can have cheaper energy?
What's a Tory majority going to do for you (no need to answer if you're a big corporation) that makes you want to support them?" 

Listen - a couple times in fact- to these powerfully poetic words smithed by the star of the Vancouver 2010 Olympic Opening Ceremonies, Slam Poetry Champion Shane Koyczan.